Why Fitbit buying Pebble because, Can't afford buying Other Competitors
Late
yesterday it was reported by The
Information that Fitbit is close to
buying wearable startup Pebble, news that has since been
independently confirmed by The Verge. Fitbit and Pebble have
been in the final stages of the deal since before the Thanksgiving holiday; the
buying price has not yet been confirmed. While it ultimately might not be as
good of a deal as Pebble would have hoped for, there are a lot of reasons why a
Pebble-Fitbit deal makes sense.
First,
the deal comes at a time when the wearables market is facing a day of
reckoning. Google delayed its
next version of Android Wear software until
next year, and three key makers of Android Wear watches — LG, Huawei, and
Motorola — held off on launching
new hardware this fall. Jawbone
is reportedly looking to
sell itself. And Fitbit, despite being the clear leader in the
wearables industry, just saw its stock fall off a cliff after it forecasted a
dismal holiday quarter.
Consolidation
comes as no big surprise then — see also Nokia and Withings,
or the number of digital health apps that have
been snatched up by larger companies. Ever since the notion of the quantified
self first became a thing with these digital trackers, their
perceived value has been largely dependent on how much data they could gather,
and how companies could use that data. If a company is struggling to sell
hardware, it could always sell off its platform or its data.
Second,
for Fitbit, acquiring Pebble would mean just that: it’s not about the hardware,
but about acquiring talent, software, and a homegrown smartwatch platform.
While “basic” activity trackers like Fitbits are in a better position
than “smartwatches” right
now, according to data from research firm IDC, Fitbit mentioned more
than once a softening in demand for basic activity trackers on its recent
third-quarter earnings call. Owning a smartwatch platform would help diversify
Fitbit’s product lineup if it chooses to go further down the smartwatch path.
A buy
also lets Fitbit essentially kill off the only competitor it can. Aside from
Fitbit and Pebble, the top wearable makers come in at the very high end
(Apple), very low end (Xiaomi), or specialized (Garmin). Buying those
multi-billion dollar competitors is not an option for Fitbit. Buying Pebble is.
Lastly, the actual
products the companies make are aligned in a bunch of ways. Both Fitbit and
Pebble take a sparse, utilitarian approach to aesthetics — although Fitbit has
made much more of an effort to design for women — and both have designed their
wearables to last for five to seven days per battery charge. Both make their
own on-device software and are agnostic when it comes to which smartphones they
work with. Both share data freely with other third-party apps, although Fitbit
has stubbornly refused to allow data-sharing with Apple Health or Google Fit
software.
And
Pebble in recent months has focused
more on health and fitness tracking, after determining that health and fitness
are the main draws for people interested in buying a smartwatch. The newest
Pebble watches have built-in optical heart rate sensors, and the company made a
big deal about the health-tracking algorithms it developed in collaboration
with researchers at Stanford University. (Pebble is not alone in this thinking;
Apple also doubled down on health and fitness tracking with its new,
GPS-equipped, swim-ready Apple Watch Series 2.)
Pebble,
which is led by founder and CEO Eric Migicovsky, first rose up in the wearables
market in 2012 after running a
record-breaking Kickstarter campaign for
its original Pebble watch. The watch began shipping in 2014, and found a cult
following in the early-adopter, tech-enthusiast crowd. In early 2015, Pebble
said it had sold 1 million smartwatches — surpassing Android Wear numbers at
the time — and was profitable.
But
people familiar with the company’s inner-workings have said Pebble has been
struggling for the past year. In March it said
it was laying off 25 percent of its staff due
to a lack of funds. Pebble has raised at least $15 million in venture capital
funding to date, according to
Crunchbase; that’s not counting the millions it has raised through its famed
Kickstarter projects. In our
review of its newes smartwatch, the Pebble 2, we found the heart rate tracking
to be inaccurate, and the company’s Pebble Time 2 watch has been delayed,
resulting in a series of complaints from early buyers on the Pebble Kickstarter
page.
It may
not be the desired ending for Pebble, which is said to have had early stage
conversations with other potential acquirers before. But it may be the
inevitable one.
No comments: